Release notes

A new system for user roles and rights was introduced into the SCL webtool. From now on, this will allow you to easily give external people access to your online file or make them co-managers.

Reason for improvement
If people were already registered in the web tool with another organisation, they could not be added to new organisations. This was particularly inconvenient for auditors, consultants and respondents.
 
What will you notice about the new feature?
From now on, you can add readers by entering an email address. You no longer have to choose from a list of organisations and auditors or consultants.

Users linked to multiple organisations can now switch to the desired organisation at the top right of the profile name. Respondents do not have this option and still have to start the questionnaire via the received invitation.

The SAQ Compact is now also available in German language.

Update April 19, 2022

Today the new version of the SAQ Compact was released: SAQ Compact 2.0. This version is automatically loaded when creating a new SAQ Compact questionnaire. All questionnaires created for today are linked to the SAQ Compact 1.0. These just keep working.

Note: The SAQ Compact is currently only available in Dutch. The English translations will follow asap.

Changes compared to previous version SAQ Compact

• Splitting questions by type of employee (target respondent)  : 

  • a set of questions for the operational employee. This only contains questions about things that they might notice, experience in the workplace. 

  • a set of questions for management/board. This only contains questions about things they need to know about the workplace, about internal management procedures and cooperation with the industry. 

• Shorter and more concrete answer options. Previously, several requirements/criteria were summarized in 1 statement (answer option). That made it harder to answer. Various requirements/criteria have now been placed in separate questions. 

• An extra answer option: “no”, so a fictitious step 1 answer. 

• 2 question types: both “multiple answers possible” and “one answer possible”. In some cases the respondent can recognize multiple aspects. To make it easier for the respondent, multiple answers can be ticked. 

• Clearer results: the most frequently chosen answer is now easier to recognize. Previously, weighted averages were used, because a statement could also be recognized “partly”. The percentages were more complicated for the business administrator to understand. Now it is a 100% distribution over the different steps. 

• Results display based on target group. Because there is a difference between the content and the number of questions for operational employees versus management/direction, the results cannot be shown as a net sum in one table. One can choose to show the results from either “operational” or “management/direction”. Exports can be made from each view.